2. Non-finite dependent clauses

Syntactic functions and complexity features


Non-finite dependent clauses

In contrast to finite dependent clauses, non-finite dependent clauses are distinct from their finite counterparts in that they do not contain a verb phrase marking tense or modality. Therefore, structurally they are more succinct and implicit compared to finite clauses. They typically omit an explicit subject and often do not require a subordinator, which leads to a lack of explicitness and a compact semantic structure. Interpreting a non-finite clause often requires context from the main clause and sometimes from the broader context of the discourse. There are three primary types of non-finite clauses, each characterized by a different form of verb phrase: to-infinitive clauses, ing-clauses, and ed-clauses (pp. 198-201). Below are some examples to compare between non-finite and finite clauses:

  • Example 1: to-infinitive clause
    • Non-finite: I don't know what to write in the report.
    • Finite: I don't know what I should write in the report.
  • Example 2: ing-clause
    • Non-finite: Reading through the document, she found several critical errors.
    • Finite: As she was reading through the document, she found several critical errors.
  • Example 3: ed-clause
    • Non-finite: Shocked by the news, he was unable to respond.
    • Finite: Because he was shocked by the news, he was unable to respond.

Subjects in non-finite clauses

In non-finite clauses, a subject is frequently implicit, inferred from the context rather than explicitly stated. When the subject is expressed within non-finite clauses, it takes the form of a noun phrase. In this case, the subject cannot be a clause and always appears before the verb phrase (p. 125).

  • Do you want [us] to put them back in?
  • I asked [Mother] to put his bike in the garage.